Civil Society Coalition Pushes for the Formation of a Quality KPK Leadership Committee
The current KPK leadership and supervisory board are a reflection of the selection process in 2019.
This article has been translated using AI. See Original .
About AI Translated Article
Please note that this article was automatically translated using Microsoft Azure AI, Open AI, and Google Translation AI. We cannot ensure that the entire content is translated accurately. If you spot any errors or inconsistencies, contact us at hotline@kompas.id, and we'll make every effort to address them. Thank you for your understanding.
JAKARTA, KOMPAS — The quality of the leadership selection committee and supervisory board of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) will reflect the quality of the KPK leadership and supervisory board for the period 2024–2029. Therefore, Civil Society Coalition encourages the formation of a KPK selection committee that is quality, transparent, and prioritizes meaningful participation from the community.
This position statement was conveyed by representatives of the Civil Society Coalition in Jakarta, Wednesday (8/5/2024).
The former Chairman of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), Saut Situmorang, said that the quality of the leadership and board of supervisors of KPK in the upcoming period has a heavy task in leading the anti-corruption agency in the midst of massive and structured corruption waves. In addition, as the term of President Joko Widodo is ending soon, the fate of Indonesia's anti-corruption efforts is becoming increasingly worrisome.
Also read: RI's ranking declines in eradicating corruption
This is reflected in the newly launched Corruption Perception Index by Transparency International Indonesia. The score in 2023 shows stagnation compared to the previous year. Indonesia obtained a score of 34 and its ranking dropped from 110 to 115. Looking back, Indonesia's CPI score is now the same as when President Jokowi first took office as president in 2014.
Moreover, a number of KPK leaders for the 2019–2024 period were caught in cases of law and code of ethics, including KPK Chairman Firli Bahuri who was named a suspect in the extortion case against former Minister of Agriculture Syahrul Yasin Limpo by Polda Metro Jaya . There is also a case of alleged extortion involving 15 KPK employees.
Therefore, according to Saut, the future leaders and supervisory board of the KPK have a heavy responsibility to restore the values of integrity that can prevent corruption. The nine values adhered to by the KPK are honesty, care, independence, discipline, responsibility, hard work, simplicity, courage, and fairness.
"Until those values are consistently returned in line with its philosophy, whatever is done, whether changing the law, replacing the system, or replacing the people, will still face low corruption perception indices," he said.
Before those values are consistently restored according to their philosophy, no matter what is done, whether changing the law, the system, or the people themselves, they will still face low corruption perception indexes.
According to Saut, choosing the KPK leadership and supervisory board is not easy. Assessments using psychological tests and track records are not completely effective. “Psychotesting and track records can be deceptive too. "The psychological test is good, or the track record is good, but it turns out the performance is bad," said Saut.
Therefore, according to him, a new assessment method is needed that can measure a person's understanding of KPK values in addition to their ability and expertise in uncovering legal cases.
Also read: Waiting for the KPK to be Strong Again
Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW) researcher Kurnia Ramadhana stated that the current leadership and supervisory board of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) are a reflection of the selection process for leadership and supervisory board members in 2019.
"Five years ago, public attention was focused on the selection process for KPK leaders. From the names of the existing candidates, there is no positive tone from the public. "However, we are forced to work with a selection committee that is not participatory," he said.
Also read: KPK continues to decay
He exemplified how the selection committee passed the names of KPK leader candidates who did not have compliance with the State Officials Wealth Report (LHKPN). Although LHKPN reporting is one of the administrative integrity proofs of leader candidates. Therefore, it is not surprising that the selection process resulted in problematic KPK leadership.
To prevent similar cases from happening again, the Civil Society Coalition consisting of Transparency International Indonesia, IM57+ Institute, the Indonesian Legal Aid and Human Rights Association (PBHI), and Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW) are pushing for the selection committee for the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) to consider criteria such as track record in corruption eradication and proven integrity.
Also read: Finding a way to recover the Corruption Eradication Commission after its decline
In addition, the Civil Society Coalition urges that the selection and selection process for the panel committee be carried out openly and involve meaningful participation from the community. The Pansel must also be sensitive to three main issues, namely the decline in the independence of the Corruption Eradication Committee following the revision of the 2019 Corruption Eradication Commission Law, reinforcing the Corruption Eradication Committee's function in law enforcement for criminal acts of corruption, and prioritizing the prevention of corruption in the political sector a>.